Authentic Lessons for 21st Century Learning

Lord of the Flies Unit, Lesson 7

Good to Be Bad

Margaret Salesky, Lindsey Link | Published: August 12th, 2022 by K20 Center

  • Grade Level Grade Level 9th
  • Subject Subject English/Language Arts
  • Course Course British Literature, Composition

Summary

In this seventh lesson of the "Lord of the Flies" unit, students examine the idea of evil and whether or not individuals can overcome the worst thing they have ever done.

Essential Question(s)

How does the author use symbolism to develop characterization and theme?

Snapshot

Engage

Students participate in an Always, Sometimes, or Never True activity.

Explore

Students read assigned articles attempting to answer these questions: Can we come back from the worst thing we’ve ever done? Does the worst thing we have ever done define who we are?

Explain

Students share articles using a Jigsaw activity.

Extend

Students discuss topics in a Socratic Seminar.

Evaluate

Students watch a video and answer the following question based on the reading and class discussion in a Flip: Do you agree with the argument made by Bryan Stevenson?

Materials

Engage

Use the attached Lesson Slides to guide the lesson. Display slide 3. Remind students of the essential question for the unit. Display slide 4 and review the learning objectives for this lesson.

Display slide 5. Pass out the attached Always, Sometimes, Never True handout.

Review the directions for the Always, Sometimes, or Never True strategy with students and have them reflect on the quotes in the handout individually.

Once students have completed the Always, Sometimes, Never True handout, show slides 6-11 to guide a whole group discussion. Encourage students to take notes on their handouts as their classmates give their reasons for their answers.

Explore

Display slide 12. Share the instructional strategy, Jigsaw, with students. Assign students to groups of four. Then have them number off from 1 to 4 within each group. Distribute the following news articles and have students read the article corresponding to their number. There should be four students per group, with each group member reading a different article ("ones" reading article one, "twos" reading article two, etc.).

  1. "Psychology of Fraud: Why Good People Do Bad Things"

  2. "Why Do Good People Do Bad Things?"

  3. "What Makes Good People Do Bad Things?"

  4. "Do Juvenile Killers Deserve Life Behind Bars?"

As students read, ask them to monitor their reading to answer the questions. They are becoming an "expert" on their article.

  • Can we come back from the worst thing we have ever done?

  • Does the worst thing we have ever done define who we are?

Explain

Display slide 13. To complete the Jigsaw activity, have students share out their articles with their groups. After the groups have completed their discussions and expanded their information about this topic, hold a class discussion.

Ask students to share any new information they have learned from the reading. Have students reflect on how their earlier knowledge differed from or was expanded by reading the articles.

Extend

Display slide 14. Inform the class that they will participate in a structured discussion on the questions: "Can we come back from the worst thing we have ever done? Does the worst thing we have ever done define who we are?"

Once the first group in the Inner Circle has completed their discussion, have the students switch spots with those in the Outer Circle.

Once both groups have had a chance to participate in the Socratic Seminar, ask students to reflect and evaluate as a class. Have students self-reflect on their participation throughout the activity and complete a general evaluation of the activity as a concluding activity.

Consider the following guiding questions as a concluding exercise:

  1. At any point, did the Socratic Seminar revert to something other than a dialogue? If so, how did your group handle this?

  2. How did group members demonstrate they were actively listening and building on others' ideas?

  3. How has your understanding of the texts been affected by the ideas explored in this seminar?

  4. What parts of the discussion did you find most interesting? In what parts were you least engaged?

  5. What would you like to do differently as a participant the next time you are in a seminar?

Evaluate

Display slide 15. Ask students to critically view the video as you play it.

Based on the reading, discussion, and any part of this lesson, ask the students: "Do you agree with the argument made by Bryan Stevenson?"

Display slide 16. Ask the students to record their response to this prompt in Flip.

Resources