Authentic Lessons for 21st Century Learning

Bridging Minds: Connecting Experiences to New Concepts for Higher-Order Thinking

Brittany Bowens, Shelby Blackwood, Laura Halstied, Laura Young, Tanner Lusher, Sherry Franklin, Rachelle Johnson, Michael Grubb, Amber Smith, Corrie Matchell | Published: September 5th, 2024 by K20 Center

Summary

In this session, participants will explore the construction of knowledge, one of the components of authenticity. Participants will discover the value of learning experiences that reflect real-world contexts and challenges by connecting students' prior experiences with new concepts to deepen understanding and foster critical thinking. Participants will complete authentic tasks that require the application of higher-order thinking skills and learn how to cultivate meaningful learning experiences that prepare students for real-life problem-solving and decision-making.

Essential Questions

How can we use students’ prior knowledge and critical thinking skills to assist them in developing a higher level of understanding?

Learning Goals

  • Recognize the importance of connecting students’ prior experiences to new concepts.

  • Apply higher-order thinking skills to solve complex problems and analyze methods to teach students how to use those skills to make informed decisions.

Snapshot

Engage

Participants identify their current approaches to connecting students’ prior knowledge to new content.

Explore

Participants demonstrate their knowledge of content area standards in a Card Sort activity.

Explain

Participants read a research brief and create a visual representation of their understanding of Construction of Knowledge using the Frayer Model.

Extend

Participants collaborate to devise new methods for relating students’ prior experiences to content areas.

Evaluate

Participants reflect on the knowledge gained from the session using the Inside Out instructional strategy.

Materials List

  • Presentation Slides (attached)

  • Inside Out handout (attached, one per group of two or three participants)

  • Card Sort sets (attached, one per group of two or three participants; use math, ELA, social studies, or science card sort depending on the content areas of your participants)

  • Components of Authenticity: Construction of Knowledge research brief (linked, one per participant; print two-sided)

  • Frayer Model handout (attached, one per participant)

  • Authentic Lesson Reflection Tool handout (linked, one per participant)

  • Instructional Strategy Note Catcher handout (attached, one per participant)

Engage

10 Minute(s)

Use the attached Presentation Slides to guide the session. Begin by displaying the title slide and introducing yourself and the session to the participants. Transition to slide 3 and invite participants to reflect on the following prompts:

  • Why is it important to determine your students’ prior knowledge about a topic?

  • How do you currently assess students’ prior knowledge?

Invite participants to discuss their responses to the prompts as a group at their table, then ask a few participants to share out their responses.

Display slide 4 and distribute the Inside Out handout to each participant. Read aloud the following prompt from the slide:

  • What do you know about gauging students’ prior knowledge?

Invite participants to fill in the innermost circle of the handout with their response to the prompt and begin the 1-minute timer on the slide.

Once time is up, transition to slide 5 and ask participants to find a partner. Invite each pair to discuss their responses to the prompt and and record any new ideas in the middle circle of the handout labeled “What I learned from my discussion with my partner.” Start the 3-minute timer on the slide.

After participants have had time to discuss, briefly explain the Inside Out instructional strategy to the whole group. Explain that this strategy helps students arrange, organize, and connect prior knowledge to new information on a topic, which contributes to the overall construction of knowledge. Invite participants to set aside their handouts as they will use them again later.

Transition to slides 6 and 7 and highlight the essential question and learning goals of this session.

Explore

15 Minute(s)

Ask participants to form groups of two or three and pass out one set of the prepared Card Sort sets to each group. Transition to slide 8 and explain the instructions. Allow participants time to work and walk around the room offering assistance to and answering questions from groups as needed.

Once each group has had the opportunity to organize their cards, transition to slide 9 and notify the participants that they will return to the cards later. Explain that participants will now explore their state’s academic standards using the link included in the slide. Allow participants time to read through the standards, then ask if they would like to adjust their card groupings.

Invite groups to share out how they organized their cards and any strategies or methods they used to sort them. As a whole group, discuss these methods and the final results of each group’s card sort. Finally, explain the Card Sort instructional strategy to participants, mentioning that this strategy invites students to both sort prior knowledge of a topic and justify their organization of topics to their classmates.

Explain

20 Minute(s)

Display slide 10 and organize participants into groups of four. Give each participant a copy of the Components of Authenticity: Construction of Knowledge research brief. Ask participants to individually read the brief and allow them time to do so.

Once it appears that most participants have read the handout, display slide 11 and give each person a copy of the Frayer Model handout. Explain that each group member will fill in a different quadrant of the handout to demonstrate their understanding of Construction of Knowledge. Ask each member of the group to choose one of the following prompts present on the handout:

  • Define: How would you define “construction of knowledge” in your own words?

  • List the Characteristics: List three to five essential characteristics of COK.

  • Draw a visual representation: Sketch a scene or symbol that represents COK.

  • Reflect: How does this look in your class? Give an example of how COK looks in your class.

Once each group member has filled out their individual section, ask them to discuss their responses as a group. Each person will fill in the remaining sections of their Frayer Model with the responses from their peers.

Allow groups approximately fifteen minutes to discuss and fill in their Frayer Models. After most participants have completed their handouts, invite each group to share out one of the segments of their model.

Briefly explain the Frayer Model instructional strategy. Inform participants that this strategy encourages students to organize both prior and new knowledge about a topic.

Extend

30 Minute(s)

Display slide 12 and pass out one copy of the model lesson and one copy of the Authentic Lesson Reflection Tool handout to each participant. Ask participants to read through the model lesson and identify where they see components of Construction of Knowledge present in the lesson.

Allow participants time to read the brief, then place then into small groups. Ask each group to discuss the following prompts:

  • What prior knowledge do your students need in order to understand the lesson?

  • How does the lesson encourage students to use Construction of Knowledge?

  • How would you prepare to deliver the lesson to your students? Would you need to scaffold, modify, etc.?

Allow participants time to discuss the questions, then come together as a whole group. Invite participants to share their responses.

Evaluate

5 Minute(s)

Display slide 13 and ask participants to retrieve their Inside Out handouts. Ask participants to reflect on what they have learned about Construction of Knowledge during this session then respond to the prompt in the outermost circle of their handouts.

Invite participants to share out their responses.

Transition to slide 14 and invite participants to reflect on the different instructional strategies they saw used throughout the session. Ask them to consider the impact these strategies had on their understanding or approach.

As they reflect, pass out one copy of the Instructional Strategy Note Catcher handout to each participant. Invite participants to fill in the first column with their thoughts on how each strategy impacted their understanding of the content. Ask them to fill in the second column with their ideas about how to integrate each strategy into their teaching practices.

If time permits, invite participants to share out their ideas about how they could use the instructional strategies in their classrooms.

Research Rationale

Learning involves actively relating new concepts to one's pre-existing understanding and personal experiences (Bransford et al., 2000). New insights from cognitive, neurological, and developmental research emphasize that learning is a sophisticated interplay between learners and their social and physical contexts, resulting in observable changes to the brain's neural architecture (Liu et al., 2017; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM], 2018). Recent studies also indicate that, while deep cognitive processing generally yields superior learning outcomes, the specific results are contingent upon three primary factors: the complexity of the learning task, the degree of instructional scaffolding provided, and the differences in learners' prior knowledge. Notably, both superficial and deep cognitive processes frequently co-occur within a single learning activity. This simultaneous engagement can either facilitate or impede the learner's progress, largely dependent on the design and structure of the educational task (Dinsmore & Alexander, 2016). Educators play a crucial role in facilitating meaningful learning by creating diverse opportunities for students to engage in active learning and employ higher-order cognitive skills.

Resources