Summary
This professional learning activity asks participants to reflect on meaningful learning experiences through the question, "What makes learning meaningful?" Participants build up a definition of meaningful learning as they progress through the activities. Participants will experience a lesson that models the components of the Authentic Learning Framework, look at the research on authentic learning, and then reflect on how the lesson they experienced modeled the framework's components. Participants will then consider and discuss how the Authentic Learning Framework can be applied in their own teaching practice.
Essential Questions
How does authentic teaching engage students in meaningful learning?
How do teachers support authentic learning in the classroom?
Snapshot
Engage
Participants will consider their most meaningful learning experience, listing adjectives that describe it, and generate a comprehensive list of words with the larger group.
Explore
Participants will engage with the authenticity approach through an example lesson.
Explain
Participants will read about the components of authenticity, working as a group in order to understand their assigned component and to create a visual representation.
Extend
Participants will discuss and summarize authenticity, analyze how it is currently present in their schools, and explore ways it might be further implemented.
Evaluate
Participants will consider how authenticity can be applied to their role as educators.
Materials List
Presenter slides (attached)
Authenticity Practitioner’s Brief handout (attached; optional; one per person)
Components of Authenticity handout (attached; optional; one per person)
Authenticity Job Aids handout (attached; one per person)
Critical Thinking Cubes handout (attached; one per table)
Author Influences handout (attached; optional; one per person)
Notes About Vampires handout (attached; optional; one per person)
Card Matching handout (attached; optional; one set per group)
Vampire Readings Jigsaw handout (attached; optional; one per person)
Sticky notes (two stacks per table)
Chart paper
Markers
Paper and pens
Materials for the model lesson of your choice (see list in the Explore section)
Learning Goals
Experience a shortened version of a model lesson featuring multiple components of the Authentic Learning Framework.
Identify and explain how the activities in the lesson demonstrate each component of authenticity.
Apply the Authentic Learning Framework to the classroom.
Preparation
30 Minute(s)
Set out sticky notes at each table. Place chart paper on the wall or board for use during the Engage section.
Download and prep the materials for the model lesson in the Explore section. If you are using the model lesson “Monster Monday: The Good, the Bad, and the Sparkly,” make a copy of the Vampires ASN Menti. Prior to facilitating, you will need to update the links, access code, and QR graphic on slide 11. Also be sure that you have the Menti results link open in a new tab to share with participants in real time. Additionally, prep the Card Matching activity.
Print, cut, fold, and glue the critical thinking cubes in advance for use in the Extend section. Make enough to have one per table.
Create a Padlet with one column for each prompt in the Evaluate section or use this link to remake the provided Padlet for your session and clear the example answers. Then update the QR code on slide 44. Alternatively, you can also set up this activity using individual sticky notes or notecards.
Engage
15 Minute(s)
Use the provided Presenter Slides to facilitate this session. Introduce the session with the title on slide 2. Move to slide 3 and ask participants to think about their most meaningful learning experience. Invite them to write on a piece of paper a list of characteristics or adjectives describing what made that learning experience meaningful for them. Start the K20 Two-minute timer.
After two minutes, each person at a table can share their experiences and their characteristics list with their table group. After each person at the table has shared their experience, determine 3-5 common characteristics between the meaningful learning experiences that were shared.
Move to slide 4 and have each table choose a representative who will stand up with their group’s list of shared characteristics. Then, as a whole room, conduct the Stand Up/Sit Down strategy.
Have one standing representative at a time from each group read one item from their list.
Write this word on a large piece of chart paper, whiteboard, or other place that is visible for the whole room. This will serve as an Anchor Chart and be revisited later in this activity to construct a shared definition of authentic learning.
Have all the other representatives mark this item off their own list if it’s too similar to something they already have.
Have the next representative read a word from their list. Write this word down on the chart paper and have all other representatives mark this word from their list if they have it as well.
Ask representatives to sit down when all of the characteristics they have on their list have been stated.
Go to slide 5 to highlight the session objectives briefly. This will provide a roadmap of where they will go together during the session and will let participants know what to expect from the session.
Move on to slide 6 and play the teacher testimony video.
This brief video will provide an emotional hook into the value of using this framework. Move to slide 7 and revisit the Anchor Chart after the video. Ask participants if they noticed any of the characteristics from our list showing up in this testimonial. Ask if there are any characteristics of note in the video that are not on the list yet.
Explore
75 Minute(s)
Begin the model lesson with the title on slide 8 and remind participants that the content is designed for high school students. The topic is not as important for them to focus on so much as the approach that is being used to teach the topic. Move on to slides 9 and 10 to introduce the essential question and learning objectives for the model lesson.
Begin the Menti version of the Always, Sometimes, Never activity on slide 11. If needed, unhide slides 12-16 for the non-Menti version of this activity. In this activity, participants will respond to statements about vampires as if they are always true, sometimes true, or never true. The purpose of this activity is to activate prior knowledge. They will see responses from the entire room so that they can compare their own assumptions about these tropes with the group’s assumptions as a whole. They might be surprised that everyone has different experiences or impressed that the whole group has had very consistent experiences informing them about vampires.
Then, move to slide 17 and review the definition of “trope.” This will lead into the next activity on slide 18, where participants will follow the Affinity Process and write as many characteristics as possible of vampires that they can think of on one piece of paper in three minutes. Start the K20 3-Minute Timer. Once they’ve run out of ideas and the three minutes are up, move to slide 19 so that participants can compare their notes with those of an Elbow Partner and see if there are some broad categories into which they can fit their combined characteristics. They can use another blank piece of paper to label the categories of tropes they identified. Start the K20 3-Minute Timer. Once the timer has run out, move to slide 20 and, using the K20 5-Minute Timer, have each set of partners at a table compare their categories and determine how they can combine them together into groups. Move to slide 21 and have participants share their group’s categories, reminding them that they will use those in the next activity.
Move on to slide 22 and pass out the Notes About Vampires handout. Explain that many of the tropes brainstormed in the last activity will be visible in action as they watch a few movie and television show clips as well as read excerpts from novels about vampires. As they watch or read each piece, start the I Notice, I Wonder strategy by asking participants to jot down the tropes they notice.
Pass out the Author Influences handout to each participant (or per pair) then play the videos on slides 23-25. Be sure to pause for a moment after showing each clip and ask participants to review their handout and read about the author of that work. Once all the clips have been viewed, move to slide 26 and have participants complete the “I Wonder” column. Encourage them to make note of any connections the participants wonder about between the author’s influences and the way they wrote their vampire characters and used these tropes in their work.
Display side 27 and pass out the Vampire Readings Jigsaw handout having groups of three Jigsaw the readings. This means that each person in the group will read a different excerpt and then share their notes with their group members. Use the same instructions on taking notes in their graphic organizer for the readings as for the videos.
Once the groups have finished taking and sharing notes on the readings, move on to slide 28, and begin to hand out the set of cards from the Card Matching handout for the timeline Card Sort. Have participants group the cards based on what year in the timeline they believe they fit into.
Arrange title covers by date they were published. (
Publication dates are on the organizer.)
Place vampire tropes under the title cover that it matches. (Some tropes may be used more than once.)
The goal for this activity is for participants to take what they have learned about vampire tropes to this point and combine it with potential political, economic, and historical influences on how vampires have been represented through literature and media. Once groups are finished sorting, share the answers on slide 29.
Display slide 30. Depending on how time is going, have participants complete the One-Pager activity or describe it to them as a final assessment of learning (unhide slides 31-34 to display example products of this activity). If time permits, have participants create a poster on chart paper or digitally that illustrates and answers the questions, "How do these authors address the same topic?" and "How did these authors reach different conclusions due to the time period in which they wrote?"
If you choose not to conduct the One-Pager activity, use the Exit Ticket on slide 35 to take an assessment of learning.
Note the end of the model lesson by showing the standard that was addressed on slide 37.
Explain
45 Minute(s)
Move on to slide 38 to show the four components of the Authentic Learning Framework and provide a very brief overview. At this time, distribute the Authenticity Job Aids handout and the reading material of your choice for the authenticity framework (recommended: either the Authenticity Practitioner’s Brief handout or the Components of Authenticity handout, both attached to this session).
Have participants form groups based on which of the four components they read. As a group, they will create a Frayer Model poster about the component they have been assigned.
Student-centered Learning
Construction of Knowledge
Inquiry-based Learning
Real-world Connections
Display slide 39 with the instructions for the activity and provide each group with a piece of chart paper and marker(s). Each group will make a poster demonstrating their component through four main segments of information:
Definition: Write their own definition for the component.
Main characteristics: List 3-5 characteristics that are essential to this component.
Draw a picture: Sketch a scene or symbol that represents their component.
Describe: Give an example from the model lesson where they saw this component represented.
Provide about fifteen minutes for groups to create their posters. Have groups that covered the same topic get together, compare their posters, and synthesize the most significant aspects of their component.
Display slide 40 and explain the process for a Gallery Walk/Carousel. Each group stops at each other’s set of posters and takes notes using the Exclaim and Question strategy. At this point, they may begin to notice that activities done during the lesson covered more than one component and that aspects of each component support one another. Each group can share one thing that stood out and one question they have with the whole room.
Have participants review the “Authentic Lesson Reflection Tool” on the back of their Authenticity Job Aids handout and go through each component, having someone share something from the model lesson and how it supported that component until all of the components are covered.
Finally, revisit the Meaningful Learning Experiences Anchor Chart from the beginning of this session and transition to slide 41 to explain the process. Have each table group pick something from the list and share which component of authenticity it fits into and their reasoning for why. Display slide 42 and have each group share the reflection of their group’s poster.
Extend
30 Minute(s)
Transition to slide 43. In table groups, have participants take turns rolling the provided Critical Thinking Cube and answer the question it lands on. Provide enough time for each person to have a turn or two. Start the provided K20 4-Minute Timer.
Prompts provided for this Critical Thinking Cube are:
Describe: What are students doing in an authentic classroom?
Apply: How do you see authenticity used in your role at your school?
Compare: How is authenticity different from non-example practices of authenticity in your role?
Analyze: What steps need to be made to develop authenticity in your role? (How do you currently plan your lessons? What resources/school climates need to be considered?)
Synthesize: In your role, brainstorm activities that would be authentic experiences for your students.
Arguments: What reservations do you have about implementing authenticity?
After all the turns have been completed, hold a whole table discussion where, as a group, participants summarize what they discovered about authenticity during this activity.
Evaluate
15 Minute(s)
Move to slide 44. Either access the Padlet you created earlier, a board with sticky notes, or individual note cards that can be shared verbally using the Mirror, Microscope, Binoculars strategy. Each participant will answer the following three prompts on their own:
Mirror: How has the authentic framework changed your thinking about meaningful learning?
Microscope: (pledge): How can the authentic framework be applied to your classroom/practice?
Binoculars: How can the authentic framework affect your school or community?
Discuss the board posts as a whole group.
Research Rationale
At its heart, authentic learning aims to infuse learning with purpose and meaning so that students develop the skills necessary to fully engage with the world at large. Authentic learning experiences increase positive emotions around learning, garner higher perceptions of relevance and long-term understanding, and activate student engagement in learning and intrinsic motivation to learn (Nachtigall et al, 2022; Parsons et al., 2021; Jeter et al, 2019; Kuhlthau, et al., 2015). Students with more positive attitudes toward learning see improved achievement (Freedman, 1997), and when students put more effort into their learning, it improves their long-term retention of the content (Schmid & Bogner, 2015). Authentic practices create a school setting that integrates with the real world to make the transfer of skills easier for learners when they enter the workforce (Osher et al., 2020).
Resources
Jeter, G., Baber, J., Heddy, B., Wilson, S., Williams, L., Atkinson, L., & Gam, G. (2019). Students at the center: Insights and implications of authentic, 5E instruction in high school English language arts. Frontiers in Education, 4, 91). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00091.
K20 Center. (n.d.). Affinity process. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/87
K20 Center. (n.d.). Always, sometimes, or never true. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/145
K20 Center. (n.d.). Anchor charts. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/58
K20 Center. (n.d.). Card sort. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/147
K20 Center. (n.d.). Critical thinking cube. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/1583
K20 Center. (n.d.). Elbow partners. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/116
K20 Center. (n.d.). Exclaim and question. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/94
K20 Center. (n.d.). Frayer model. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/126
K20 Center. (n.d.). Gallery walk/Carousel. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/118
K20 Center. (n.d.). I notice, I wonder. https://learn.K20center.ou.edu/strategy/180
K20 Center. (n.d.). Jigsaw. Strategies.
K20 Center. (n.d.). Mirror, microscope, binoculars. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/3020
K20 Center. (n.d.). One-Pager. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/72
K20 Center. (n.d.). Padlet. Tech Tools.
K20 Center. (n.d.). Stand up, sit down. Strategies. https://learn.k20center.ou.edu/strategy/1771
K20 Center. (2021, September 21). K20 Center 2-minute timer. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/HcEEAnwOt2c?si=DoVAyQWMg914g3SO
K20 Center. (2021, September 21). K20 Center 3-minute timer. [Video]. YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iISP02KPau0
K20 Center. (2021, September 21). K20 Center 4-minute timer. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpCsfuvzQeY
K20 Center. (2021, September 21). K20 Center 5-minute timer. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVS_yYQoLJg
K20 Center. (2019, May 21). ILI2019-Milton Bowens on Authenticity. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x-t3MCR1Yo
Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. ABC-CLIO.
Nachtigall, V., Shaffer, D. W., & Rummel, N. (2022). Stirring a secret sauce: A literature review on the conditions and effects of authentic learning. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1,479–1,516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09676-3
Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2020). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 6–36.
Parsons, A. E., Heddy, B., Wilson, Scott N., Williams, L. A., Atkinson, L.K. & Garn, G.A. (2021). Making ‘Brain Food’: Converting photosynthesis into a positive learning experience through authentic instruction. Journal of Biological Education, 55(3), 293-305, DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2019.1682640
Schmid, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2015). Effects of students’ effort scores in a structured inquiry unit on long-term recall abilities of content knowledge. Education Research International 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/826734